Classical Argument

1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.

I will start by saying that my argument is very important. Most of people think technology only have a good effect and heavily rely on it. But my topic is that robots will take human's jobs in the future and the reason why I choose this idea as a topic is that people are not that conscious about it. In order to be not replaced by technology, we need to be aware of negative effects of technology development.

2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.

I will give a basic idea that unemployment rate of laborer and technology development are related. As the digital revolution started unfolding in earnest during the 1980s, the cost of computing power fell precipitously. As a result, companies began investing in high-tech equipment instead of comparatively inefficient and expensive employees. The technology boom, the researchers argue, explains about half the drop in labor's share of the world's economy

3. The confirmation, which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.

I will explain the reasons in this order. 1. Robot technology development will be more advanced in the future.  2. Unemployment rate of laborer and technology development are related. 3. Technology already has replaced many human jobs.

4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.

1. It is not impressive because we cannot predict future just as we did in the past : Yes, prediction is not always true. But statistics reveal that relation between unemployment rate of laborer and technology development. 2. How can you prove it?: statistics. It is not hard to find some materials to prove the argument.

5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument, and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.

I will close with a summary of my previous points by arguing that people must consider how technology will affect us in the future to not be replaced by them. The only solution is that people are aware of this.